I have another example for us to examine. This time it is a marriage record that doesn’t provide a lot of identifying information. I have to share my speculation of why I believe this record to be connected to Samuel Bailey Barton.
“Ohio, County Marriages, 1789-2013,” database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org: accessed 20 January 2016), S. B. Barton and Nancy A. Miller, 01 Sep 1885; citing Franklin, Ohio, United States, reference p161; county courthouses, Ohio.
I wrote the following reason statement:
Marriage record for S B Barton and Nancy A Miller in Franklin County, Ohio. S B Barton is believed to be Samuel Bailey Barton. The couple is in Franklin County, Ohio after their marriage and throughout the rest of their lives. The 1900 US Census placed their marriage around 1886. The Sept. 1885 marriage in the location where they lived the remainder of their lives suggests that this is the right record about this couple.
The record provides the name of the couple and their marriage date and license date.
Notice how I gave as much detail as I could. I mentioned what was found on the record and tied this record to previously discovered research. I also included why there could be conflicts (S B Barton vs Samuel Barton).
Once again, I focus on following the guiding principle for writing reason statements. Provide enough information that I can remember why I attached a record.
If you have something that I’m lacking in this statement, feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below.